CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
LE FLORE COUNTY • CS-2026-00168

LVNV Funding LLC v. Rose Adkins

Filed: Mar 19, 2026
Type: CS

What's This Case About?

Let’s get one thing straight: Rose Adkins of Le Flore County, Oklahoma, is being sued for $1,233.95 — a sum so specific it sounds like someone added tax to a revenge purchase and then outsourced the collection to a robot law firm. But here’s the real kicker: the company suing her doesn’t even pretend to be the original lender. No, this is not a case about betrayal or broken promises — it’s about a debt that’s been bought, sold, and resold like a haunted timeshare, now landing in court with all the drama of a financial game of hot potato.

So who are these people? On one side, we have Rose Adkins — an individual, presumably just trying to live her life, pay her bills, and avoid becoming the star of a bizarre civil court saga. We don’t know much about her, except that at some point in 2023, she opened a credit card with Credit One Bank, N.A. — the kind of bank that specializes in high-interest cards for people rebuilding credit, often with fees that multiply faster than rabbits. On the other side? LVNV Funding LLC — a name that sounds less like a real company and more like a glitch in the Matrix. LVNV isn’t a bank. It doesn’t issue credit. It doesn’t care about your credit score. What it does do is buy up delinquent debts — often for pennies on the dollar — then sue people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial ecosystem: they circle, they wait, and when someone misses a payment, they swoop in with a lawsuit.

Now, let’s follow the money — because this case is less about Rose and more about how America’s debt economy has turned personal finance into a horror show. Back in April 2023, Rose opened that Credit One card. She used it. She presumably missed some payments. Then, like clockwork, the account went delinquent. Credit One, likely having already written off the debt as a loss for tax purposes, sold it to a debt buyer — in this case, Credit Asset Sales LLC. That company then bundled Rose’s debt with thousands of others into “Portfolio 45662” — yes, that’s a real thing, and yes, it sounds like a rejected Bond villain plot — and sold the whole package to LVNV Funding or one of its predecessors. By May 2025, LVNV owned the right to collect $1,233.95 from Rose. And instead of sending a polite reminder, they did what debt buyers love to do: filed a lawsuit.

The legal claim? “Collection of debt.” That’s it. No fraud. No breach of contract drama. Just a cold, mechanical demand for payment based on a chain of ownership that looks more like a game of telephone than a legitimate financial transaction. LVNV’s lawyer — William L. Nixon, Jr., of the firm Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. (yes, really) — filed a petition claiming Rose owes the money, attaching an affidavit from someone named Kayla Watson, who swears she has “personal knowledge” of LVNV’s business records. Never mind that Kayla has never met Rose, never reviewed the original contract, and likely never even seen the physical card. Her testimony is based entirely on data — digital breadcrumbs passed from one faceless entity to another. But in court, that’s enough. Paperwork wins. Emotion loses.

Why are they in court? Because the American legal system allows companies like LVNV to sue over debts they didn’t originate, using documents that are often automated, sometimes inaccurate, and rarely challenged. Rose may have paid the debt already. She may have disputed it. She may have never even known about it. But none of that matters unless she shows up to defend herself. And here’s the dirty secret of debt collection lawsuits: most people don’t. They ignore the summons, assume it’s a scam, or can’t afford a lawyer. And when they don’t respond, the court automatically rules for the plaintiff. It’s not justice — it’s a paperwork victory.

Now, what does LVNV want? $1,233.95. Plus interest. Plus court costs. Plus attorney’s fees. Is that a lot of money? Well, it depends on your perspective. For Rose, it might be a month’s groceries, a car repair, or a utility bill. For LVNV? It’s a rounding error. These companies file thousands of lawsuits a year. One study found that in some states, debt buyers file over 1 million cases annually. They win most of them. And even when they lose, the cost of filing is so low — and the potential payout so high — that it’s a profitable business model. It’s not about Rose. It’s about volume. She’s just one data point in a massive, soulless machine.

And here’s the most absurd part: the lawsuit was filed in December 2025 — a date that, as of this writing, hasn’t even happened yet. Either this document is from the future (in which case, we have bigger problems), or there’s a typo so glaring it makes the whole thing feel like a glitch in the legal matrix. But even if it’s just a clerical error, it underscores how automated and detached these cases are. No human is reading this carefully. No one is double-checking the dates. The system runs on templates, algorithms, and the assumption that no one will fight back.

So what’s our take? We’re rooting for the chaos. Not because Rose definitely didn’t owe the money — she might have. But because the idea that a debt can be sold, bundled, resold, and then litigated by a company that never lent a dime is wild. It’s like getting sued by a guy who bought your parking ticket from a stranger on Craigslist, then demanded full payment plus penalties. The entire premise feels like a scam, even when it’s technically legal. And the fact that this happens every day across America — in Oklahoma, in Texas, in Florida — should make your blood boil.

We’re not saying Rose shouldn’t pay her debts. We’re saying the system should require more than a PDF and a notarized form from someone named Kayla Watson to take someone to court. At some point, shouldn’t someone have to prove they actually own the debt? Shouldn’t there be a trail that makes sense? Shouldn’t the person being sued get a fair shot?

But no. Instead, we have LVNV Funding LLC — a company with a name like a failed tech startup — suing Rose Adkins for $1,233.95, and the court is expected to treat it like a solemn legal matter rather than the financial farce it is. And if Rose doesn’t respond? She’ll get a judgment. Her credit will tank. And LVNV will add another win to its automated tally, all for a debt they probably paid $120 for.

This isn’t justice. It’s debt theater. And the saddest part? Rose Adkins is just one of thousands starring in this show every year — whether she knows it or not.

Case Overview

$1,234 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court, OKLAHOMA
Relief Sought
$1,234 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 collection of debt collection of $1,233.95

Petition Text

561 words
25-55358-0 ZH1 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LE FLORE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV Funding LLC, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. Rose Adkins, ) ) No. CS-20-168 ) ) PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS ) ) COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. Credit One Bank, N.A., provided credit to the defendant on account number xxxxxxxxxxxxx8732. The Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $1,233.95. An Affidavit of Account and/or contract is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,233.95, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. [Signature] William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Gracelyn Porras Dillingham, #35852 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Daniela Westfahl, #36242 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Benjamin F. Brackett, #36580 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR LE FLORE COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Rose Adkins Defendant(s) ______________________________/ PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXXXXXXXXXXXX8732 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Rose Adkins by Credit One Bank, N.A. on or about 04/25/2023. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by Credit Asset Sales LLC. Credit Asset Sales LLC later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 45662, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 05/20/2025. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $1,233.95 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. [Signature] Kayla Watson December 17, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, December 17, 2025. (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.