CRAZY CIVIL COURT ← Back
TULSA COUNTY • CJ-2026-624

LVNV Funding LLC v. Sheila Norfleet

Filed: Feb 12, 2026
Type: CJ

What's This Case About?

Let’s cut straight to the chase: a debt collector is suing a woman for $13,713.96—over a loan she took out from a company called OneMain Financial, which then sold her debt to another company, which then hired a law firm with six attorneys listed on the filing—six!—to chase her for money she allegedly never paid. And no, this isn’t some elaborate Squid Game-style underground debt ring. This is Tuesday in Tulsa County.

Meet Sheila Norfleet. We don’t know much about her, and that’s fine—this isn’t Real Housewives of Tulsa, it’s civil court. But we do know this: at some point in 2021, she borrowed money from OneMain Financial Group, LLC. Now, OneMain isn’t exactly the neighborhood lemonade stand of lenders. They’re a big-name subprime lender—basically, the “we’ll loan you cash, but it’ll cost you” crew. They specialize in personal loans for people who might not qualify for traditional bank financing, often at sky-high interest rates. If you’ve ever seen a commercial with a guy in a flannel shirt saying, “I needed money fast,” and then cutting to him shaking hands with a calm, trustworthy-looking woman in a blazer? That’s OneMain. They’re legit, but they’re also the kind of place where a $5,000 loan can balloon into something much nastier if life throws you a curveball.

Sheila’s account—number ending in 1531, because of course it is—went south. She stopped making payments. Defaulted. The kind of thing that happens when cars break down, jobs disappear, or medical bills pile up. Life, basically. But in the world of debt collection, “life happens” doesn’t count as an excuse. It just counts as an opportunity.

Enter LVNV Funding LLC. Now, here’s where it gets juicy. LVNV isn’t some mom-and-pop debt shop operating out of a strip mall. It’s a professional debt buyer—a company that literally makes money by purchasing old, defaulted debts for pennies on the dollar and then suing people to collect the full amount. Think of them as the vultures of the financial ecosystem: they don’t lend the money, they don’t service the accounts, they just swoop in when someone’s already down and go, “Hey, that $13,000 you owe? Now it’s our problem. Pay up.”

And how do they prove they own Sheila’s debt? With an affidavit signed by a man named Andy Valdez, who claims to be an “Authorized Representative” of LVNV. He didn’t meet Sheila. He didn’t handle her loan. He probably doesn’t even know her middle name. But he swears—under penalty of perjury, notarized and everything—that LVNV now owns her debt because, back in February 2024, OneMain sold a whole portfolio of bad loans (Portfolio 43251, if you’re taking notes) to LVNV or one of its predecessor companies. It’s like buying a bulk box of expired coupons and then trying to redeem them at the grocery store—except in this case, the coupons are people’s financial regrets, and the store is the Oklahoma court system.

So here we are, October 22, 2025: LVNV, via its legal muscle LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. (yes, that’s really the name of the firm, and yes, they have six attorneys listed on a single debt collection petition), files a lawsuit in Tulsa County District Court. The claim? Simple: indebtedness. Sheila owes money. They want $13,713.96. That’s not a typo. Thirteen thousand, seven hundred thirteen dollars and ninety-six cents. And they’re not just after the principal—they want interest from the date of judgment, court costs, and a “reasonable attorney’s fee,” which, given the six-name legal tag team, might be its own lawsuit.

Now, is $13,713.96 a lot? Depends on your perspective. If you’re a hedge fund buying debt portfolios for 3% of face value, it’s chump change. If you’re a single mom in Tulsa trying to keep the lights on, it’s a mountain. For context, the median household income in Tulsa County is around $60,000. Thirteen grand is more than two months’ take-home pay for someone making minimum wage. And LVNV didn’t lend her that money out of the goodness of their hearts. They bought her debt for, conservatively, less than $2,000. So even if they win, they’re looking at a massive markup—pure profit, minus legal fees.

But here’s the real kicker: this whole case hinges on paperwork. An affidavit. A portfolio sale. A chain of ownership that starts with a loan Sheila took in 2021 and ends with a stranger in a suit demanding she pay a company she’s never heard of. No witnesses. No contract signed in court. Just a notarized statement from a guy whose job it is to say, “Yes, we own this debt,” while sitting in a back office somewhere.

And what does Sheila say? We don’t know. Not yet. This is just the petition—the opening move. She might dispute the debt. She might say she paid it. She might say she never even took out a loan with that account number. She might be homeless. She might be dead. We don’t know. The filing doesn’t say. That’s the thing about these cases—they’re one-sided stories dressed up as legal fact. The plaintiff gets to tell their version first, with all the drama of a bank statement and the emotional resonance of a spreadsheet.

But let’s be real: this isn’t about justice. It’s about volume. LVNV Funding LLC is no stranger to Oklahoma courts. They file hundreds of these cases a year. This isn’t a grudge. It’s a business model. They sue, many people don’t show up, they win by default, and the money rolls in. It’s assembly-line litigation. And with a law firm like LOVE, BEAL & NIXON (seriously, that name sounds like a 1950s detective duo) handling the paperwork, it’s clear this isn’t the first rodeo. They’ve got templates. They’ve got processes. They’ve probably got a Slack channel called #DebtWins.

So what are we rooting for? Honestly? We’re rooting for the paperwork to fail. We’re rooting for Sheila to show up in court with a receipt, a memory, or a lawyer who says, “Prove it.” Because the most absurd part of this whole thing isn’t the $13,713.96. It’s not even the six attorneys. It’s that in 2025, in America, a person can be dragged into court over a debt they may or may not owe, based on a sale they had no part in, to a company they’ve never met, all because someone in an office said, “We own this now.”

And if that doesn’t sound like a dystopian Netflix series, we don’t know what does. Welcome to the collection economy, folks. Your account is past due. Please remain seated while we sue you.

Case Overview

$13,714 Demand Petition
Jurisdiction
District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Relief Sought
$13,714 Monetary
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Claims
# Cause of Action Description
1 indebtedness

Petition Text

541 words
25-43168-0 ZH5 010 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA LVNV FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff, vs. SHEILA NORFLEET, Defendant. PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys who hereby enter their appearance herein, and for its cause of action against the defendants alleges and states as follows: 1. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, provided credit to the defendant on account number XXXX1531. Defendant defaulted on the obligation. The account has been assigned to Plaintiff. 2. Defendant owes Plaintiff $13,713.96. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $13,713.96, with interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment, all court costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. William L. Nixon, Jr., #012804 Harley L. Homjak, #019736 Peggy S. Horinek, #010344 Jenifer A. Gani, #021876 Alexander M. Hall, #33900 Mariah S. Ellicott, #36309 Mingmei "Elaine" Pok, #36236 LOVE, BEAL & NIXON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Box 32738 Oklahoma City, OK 73123 Telephone: 405-720-0565 E-Mail: [email protected] IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, OK LVNV Funding LLC Plaintiff vs. Sheila Norfleet Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT I am an Authorized Representative for LVNV Funding LLC (hereafter the "Plaintiff"), and hereby certify as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge regarding Plaintiff's creation and maintenance of its normal business records, including computer records of its accounts receivable. This information is regularly and contemporaneously maintained during the course of Plaintiff's business. I am authorized to execute this affidavit on behalf of Plaintiff and the information below is true and correct based on the Plaintiff's business records. 2. In the regular course of business, Plaintiff regularly acquires revolving credit accounts, installment accounts, service accounts, and/or other credit lines or obligations. The records provided to Plaintiff at the time of acquisition are represented to include information provided by the original creditor and/or its successors-in-interest. Such information includes the debtor's name and social security number, the account balance, the identity of the original creditor and the account number. 3. Based on the business records maintained on account XXXX1531 (hereafter, the "Account"), which are a compilation of the information provided to Plaintiff upon acquisition and information obtained since acquisition, the Account is the result of the extension of credit to Sheila Norfleet by ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC on or about 07/31/2021. Said business records further indicate that the Account was then owned by OneMain Financial Group, LLC (DE). OneMain Financial Group, LLC (DE) later sold and/or assigned Portfolio 43251, which included the Defendant's Account, to Plaintiff or Plaintiff's predecessor(s)-in-interest on 02/27/2024. Thereafter, all ownership rights were assigned to, transferred to and became vested in Plaintiff, including the right to collect the balance owing of $13,713.96 plus any legally permissible interest. 4. Based on the business records maintained in regard to the Account, the above stated amount is justly and duly owed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits to the Account have been allowed. Demand for payment was made more than thirty days ago. ________________________________________ Andy Valdez October 22, 2025 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by the above-signed on Wednesday, October 22, 2025. ______________________________ (Notary Public) PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT OF INDEBTEDNESS AND OWNERSHIP OF ACCOUNT
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from publicly available court records. Crazy Civil Court is an entertainment platform and does not provide legal advice. We are not lawyers. All information is presented as-is from public filings.